banner1 banner1 banner1

14.05.2014

Mikhail Pastukhou: 1995 referendum is legally invalid 13

9:18, — Politics

Mikhail Pastukhou: 1995 referendum is legally invalid

Lukashenka held a referendum on May 14, 1995, which became the first one in the history of independent Belarus.

As a result, the Belarusian language lost its status of the only state language and the national state symbols were replaced by slightly upgraded Soviet symbols. Many lawyers and politicians are still confident the results of the referendum are legally invalid, Radio Svaboda reports.

Prof. Doctor of Law Mikhail Pastukhou, a former judge of the Constitutional Court, says he thought a lot about the legitimacy of the referendum and came to a conclusion that it was illegal.

Nil Hilevich appealed to the Constitutional Court. He asked to evaluate the legitimacy of offering questions on replacing the state symbols and giving the status of a state language to Russian for the referendum. The court evaded considering the issue.

Time has passed. I got convinced that the court should have considered the complaint of the people's writer and member of the parliament and expressed its principled position, he said.

Mikhail Pastukhou says the questions were offered for the referendum in violation of the Constitution of Belarus, the Declaration on Sovereignty, laws on the popular vote (referendum), on electing of members of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Belarus and other legislative acts.

For example, let's take the language issue. Belarusian was the only state language, which was said in article 17 of the Constitution. It was confirmed by the Law on Languages adopted in 1990. It was a long-term programme on gradual spreading the Belarusian language in all spheres of life.

Besides, the law on the popular vote (referendum) said the questions relating to the national history, traditions, culture and language cannot be put on a referendum. So, these issues cannot become a subject of doubts and discussions. Nevertheless, they were proposed for voting, the lawyer said.

He stressed such questions shouldn't have been offered for the referendum.

The referendum contradicted both the Constitution and then legislation. So, the outcome of the referendum cannot be legitimate and have legal force since the moment when these questions were offered for voting, Mikahil Pastukhou said.

Photo: Radio Svaboda


Write your comment (13)


Export

Loading...

          


Loading...



Exchange Rates of the National Bank

02.09.1403.09.14
EUR13700,0013700,00
USD10430,0010440,00
RUB280,00280,00

Opinion


Ordinary dictator

Ordinary dictator

Yuri Khashchevatski

Kolkhoz boomerang

Kolkhoz boomerang

Natallia Radzina, Gazeta Wyborcza

Recruitment

Recruitment

Jauhien Skrabiec

Stop kissing dictators hands

Stop kissing dictators hands

Natallia Radzina

Who has benefits from holiday?

Who has benefits from holiday?

Mania Myshkavets

Belarusian Weather Forecast

   02.09   03.09 
Brest  +21
+11
+22
+11
Vitebsk  +17
+8
+18
+7
Homel  +23
+9
 +22
+10
Hrodna  +19
+9
 +20
+9
Minsk +19
+9
+20
+8
Mahilou  +18
+9
+19
+8



Yesterday's statistics:

unique visitors 333065
pageviews 2009217

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30

Old site version

Subscribe in English

Enter your email address: